Your procedure.
Your site, in every detail.
Start with the work you need to do. Entangl helps turn your site information, operating rules, and required format into a procedure your engineers can review.
Change the brief.
Watch the draft change.
Choose a procedure type and a site. Remove a source to see which information the reviewer would still need.
A useful first draft
already has the context.
The starting point is your operation: the equipment, the task, the constraints, and the format the team will use.
Specific to the equipment
Bring one-lines, asset information, manuals, and sequences of operation into preparation. Check dependencies and applicable instructions with the site team.
Built around your requirements
Use the sections, terminology, risk methodology, approval fields, and output requirements your organization expects.
Ready for an engineer’s judgement
Make missing information, stop conditions, contingency references, and approval needs explicit before the draft enters the field process.
Keep the detail
that makes it yours.
Use a finished procedure as the reference for what a good output should look like.
Discuss systems and integrationsTask and boundary
Define the equipment, work scope, affected systems, and exclusions so a draft does not quietly grow beyond the job.
Site rules and constraints
Bring access restrictions, maintenance windows, customer requirements, permits, and the site’s approved risk approach.
Template and level of detail
Test tables, headings, signatures, terminology, and export formatting. Confirm the right level of instruction for the people doing the work.
Review and revisions
Check the draft, resolve open questions, and retain the approved version in the system your process requires. Reassess site-specific details before reuse.
A useful conversation
starts with real work.
Choose a representative task, record the baseline, and agree what a useful result must demonstrate.
Open the evaluation plannerBring to the conversation
- One task and the equipment involved
- The relevant drawings, manuals, and site rules
- Your template and a procedure you consider excellent
Measure in the evaluation
- Drafting, review, and correction time together
- Missing details and unsupported assumptions
- Acceptance of the final document and its format
The questions
behind the decision.
Get the details clear before committing to a rollout.
Security and deploymentPricing and scopeCan it write MOPs, SOPs, and EOPs?
Those are core procedure types. The scope, equipment, applicable documents, and output requirements determine the useful result. Start with a task your team understands well enough to assess the generated draft.
Can we keep our Word template?
Bring the actual template and a completed example. We will test its headings, tables, risk sections, signatures, and export requirements as part of the configuration. Treat formatting fidelity as an evaluation criterion.
What if the drawings or manuals are missing?
Identify the gap and narrow the work to what the available evidence supports. The draft still needs a site expert to resolve missing states, instructions, or requirements. A plausible sentence is not a substitute for that information.
Can we edit the output or reuse a procedure at another site?
The engineer reviews and adapts the draft. A reusable structure can help, but equipment, topology, site rules, customer restrictions, and approvals must be checked again for the destination site.
Will it include contingencies and stop conditions?
Include those in the agreed output requirements and test them against the task. Your reviewer should assess prerequisites, conditions for stopping, escalation, and recovery references with the same care as the main work.
Does generation authorize the work?
No. The result is a draft for review. The site’s authorized people decide whether a procedure is acceptable and whether field work may proceed.
Procedure creation is a core workflow. Confirm supported inputs, template configuration, and export requirements with a representative document.
Bring the procedure
you wish took less time.
We’ll use your task and required output to define a useful demonstration, including what your reviewers will need to check.
We’ll agree how to share them if an evaluation follows.