Alarms tell you something.
Context tells you where to look.
Bring related signals into an issue your operator can investigate. Explore the path from a measurement to the affected equipment, supporting evidence, and a coordinated response.
Three signals.
A connected investigation.
Replay a fictional cooling incident, group the signals, and attach a response reference. Mark a sensor stale to see the uncertainty change.
What belongs together?
Bring the equipment and timing into the same investigation before deciding what to do next.
No equipment is controlled by this example.
Bring the evidence
into the response.
A useful incident view helps the operator see what is related, what is missing, and who needs to act.
Reduce context switching
Compare related measurements and events over the same period, mapped to the equipment and location your team recognizes.
See what could be affected
Follow the relationship between the signal, the asset, the dependent infrastructure, and the service your operator is investigating.
Connect to the next decision
Bring the suggested next check, procedure reference, owner, and field handoff into the response workflow within your agreed scope.
Fit the control room.
Define the boundary.
Start with one incident and prove the whole path from the source signal to an operator’s useful next action.
Discuss systems and integrationsSignals and integration
Identify the BMS, EPMS, or SCADA source, required points, units, timestamps, update rate, and supported connection path.
Data quality
Test stale, missing, mislabelled, and conflicting readings. A suggested explanation should change when the evidence changes.
Triage and response
Agree grouping, priority, ownership, acknowledgement, procedure references, and the handoff to remote or field teams.
Control authority
Scope observation, analysis, recommendations, and any equipment-control function separately. Define the human authorization and system responsibilities explicitly.
A useful conversation
starts with real work.
Choose a representative task, record the baseline, and agree what a useful result must demonstrate.
Open the evaluation plannerBring to the conversation
- A historical incident with timestamps and signal history
- The affected equipment and the response your team took
- Your monitoring system and the points available for a trial
Measure in the evaluation
- Grouping quality and relevance of suggested next checks
- Missed context, false correlations, and stale-data handling
- Time from first signal to a coordinated investigation
The questions
behind the decision.
Get the details clear before committing to a rollout.
Security and deploymentPricing and scopeDoes this replace our BMS or EPMS?
The starting point can be an analysis and workflow layer alongside those systems. Confirm which system produces the signals, where operators acknowledge events, and how Entangl fits the screens and processes already in use.
Which integrations are supported?
Bring the system, available interface, and point list. We will confirm the current connection path and configuration required for your environment. The name of a protocol alone does not establish that the complete workflow is ready.
Can it identify the root cause?
It can support an investigation by relating signals and site context within the agreed scope. Test suggested explanations against known incidents and inspect the evidence. Missing or conflicting data should remain visible rather than becoming certainty.
Does it automatically control equipment?
Observation, analysis, suggested responses, and equipment control are separate scopes. Do not infer control authority from a telemetry demonstration. Any control function needs an explicitly agreed design and authorization boundary.
Can an issue include an EOP and an iPad handoff?
That is part of the connected response direction. Demonstrate the procedure version, operator review, assignment, field handoff, and returned evidence for the proposed deployment.
What about a countdown to failure?
A response deadline and a physical prediction answer different questions. A physical forecast needs validated inputs, assumptions, and testing for that equipment and operating condition. This example does not predict time to failure.
Telemetry is scoped with your deployment. Confirm signal access, point mapping, timestamps, latency, and the observation-versus-control boundary.
Bring an incident.
Let’s replay the response.
Start with something your team has already lived through. We’ll define the signals, context, and outcome a useful evaluation needs.
We’ll agree how to share them if an evaluation follows.